The Verdict That Held: Michael Jackson Was Found Not Guilty and Here’s Why It Still Stands

Written by

Yessenia Matamoros

in

:

4–6 minutes

Michael Jackson was one of the most famous people in the world, often compared in global recognition to figures like Jesus Christ. People of any age group can refer to Jackson and immediately understand who he is. Jackson was a phenomenon that led many fans to faint at his performances. Famously, at Super Bowl XXVII in 1993, Jackson stood still for 90 seconds while 133 million viewers watched in silence before he launched into “Jam.” Many jokingly said it was nice that Jackson allowed a football game at his concert that day. But from then on, Jackson’s fandom began to decrease and lose respect when allegations surfaced that he was a child molester. After many hours of investigation, FBI raids, and trials, Jackson was acquitted of all allegations. Although Jackson was fully acquitted in 2005, many still view him as guilty. Through actual court evidence and documented facts, I will explain why the verdict still holds up.

The Charges: What Jackson Was Actually Accused Of

In 2005, People v. Jackson was a criminal trial in which Michael Jackson was charged with four counts of lewd acts upon a child, one count of attempted lewd acts, four counts of administering an intoxicating agent (alcohol) to assist in the commission of a felony, and one count of conspiracy to commit child abduction, false imprisonment, and extortion. The defense was led by high-profile attorney Thomas Mesereau, whom Jackson hired after firing two other lawyers. Mesereau was known for his aggressive cross-examinations. The prosecution was represented by Tom Sneddon, a Santa Barbara County District Attorney who brought the 10-count indictment and had previously investigated Jackson in the early 1990s. The judge was Rodney Melville, who presided over the Superior Court in Santa Maria, California.

The case centered on a thirteen-year-old boy and his family who appeared in the 2003 documentary Living with Michael Jackson, presented by Martin Bashir. Jackson later sued Bashir on the premise that the journalist used eight months of personal footage to manipulate a poor opinion of Jackson. It was shortly after this documentary hurt Jackson’s image that the new allegations began.

The “Hostage” Narrative and Why the Jury Didn’t Buy It

The evidence presented can be split into three main parts: the lack of forensic evidence, the “hostage” narrative, and the credibility of the accuser’s mother. The family alleged that Jackson’s associates held them against their will at Neverland Ranch to force them to film a “rebuttal” video to the Bashir documentary. However, the evidence worked against them. Video outtakes showed the family enjoying luxury amenities, being driven to shopping malls, and receiving professional spa treatments during the time they claimed to be captive. It was impossible to convince the jury that the family was being held hostage while enjoying such freedom.

What the FBI Raids Actually Found

Despite the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Department conducting multi-day raids involving over 70 deputies, the evidence was remarkably thin. The FBI assisted in reviewing the materials retrieved from Neverland. In Part 2 of the FBI records, the results were listed as “nothing” or “nothing notable” repeatedly. The prosecution claimed Jackson showed the boy pornography, but they could not find Jackson’s fingerprints on the specific materials described. Regarding the “intoxicants” charge, they lacked physical samples or medical evidence to prove the boy was drugged. Of the 16 hard drives seized, not a single one contained incriminating material.

Why the Accuser’s Mother Destroyed the Prosecution’s Case

The final blow to the prosecution was the lack of credibility the mother had. Mesereau portrayed the mother of the complaining witness as a con artist. He chose to attack her integrity, highlighting that she was complaining about events that took place years prior. Mesereau presented evidence that she had previously filed a fraudulent civil lawsuit against a department store, claiming security guards had assaulted her. He revealed she had received a $150,000 settlement but failed to report that income while continuing to collect welfare benefits, which further destroyed her credibility. Mesereau used these examples to argue it was in her nature to “shakedown” celebrities for money.

During cross-examination, the woman admitted she never saw her son shower or bathe with Jackson. She also conceded telling the Los Angeles District Attorney that her husband once declared the boy’s relationship with Jackson was “a wonderful way for the boy not to have to worry for the rest of his life.” When asked why she never took her son and left the ranch, she had no convincing answer.

The Verdict: Not Guilty on All Ten Counts

The six-month trial ended in Jackson’s exoneration. He was found not guilty on all ten counts. The jury, unable to find any physical evidence of wrongdoing, had to rely on the credibility of the witnesses. Because Mesereau successfully dismantled the mother’s credibility and exposed the contradictions in the “hostage” story, the jury chose to acquit. The allegations lacked proof, and Jackson was innocent in the eyes of the law.

If the evidence presented wasn’t enough and you’re thinking to yourself that Jackson was well-off and able to pay off the jury, the judge, the FBI, and maybe even the opposing lawyer — it’s been over ten years since the trial and not one person has come forward to claim this. Bribery typically presents itself years later, especially when the defendant has already passed away. Instead, we’re getting confessions from children who are now adults who admit their parents were the ones who convinced them to lie against Jackson in hopes of winning money.

Sources

For more stories like this one check out: