Improving Animal Care in Lancaster: Act 119 Revisions Needed

Closing the Loophole in Act 119 to Improve Animal Welfare in Lancaster County

Imagine a puppy confined to a small cage with other puppies, deprived of proper walks, clean water, and adequate care—all because of a loophole in Lancaster County law. This law, which is supposed to protect puppies, instead allows them to continue being raised in these inhumane conditions before being sold to unsuspecting customers.

I am here today to address an issue I discovered in Act 119 in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. This law, originally intended to protect animal welfare in dog sales, is currently being exploited by some breeders.

We need to amend Act 119 to close the loophole that enables breeders to evade essential animal welfare regulations, including those preventing animal cruelty. All kennels, regardless of size, must adhere to the same standards of care.

Background on Act 119

Act 119, passed in 2004, was designed to improve living conditions for dogs in breeding facilities across Pennsylvania.

This law represented a significant step forward in regulating large commercial kennels to ensure that animals received adequate care, space, and exercise. It brought meaningful improvements to animal welfare.

However, over time, large-scale breeders have found ways to bypass these regulations by exploiting vague language in the Act. This loophole has effectively rendered the law ineffective in many cases.

The Current Loophole and Its Consequences

Did you know that under Act 119, kennels housing fewer than 26 dogs are not subject to the same regulations as larger kennels?

To exploit this, large kennels have divided themselves into smaller operations with fewer than 26 dogs to avoid these regulations.
The lack of oversight for smaller kennels means they can neglect basic care, hygiene, and exercise without facing consequences.

Many of these breeders operate in rural areas, particularly within the Amish and Mennonite communities, where puppy mills are prevalent. Enforcement is already difficult due to cultural differences and attitudes toward animals. In these communities, dogs are often viewed as livestock rather than pets. The loophole allows this reluctance to comply with regulations to persist, resulting in widespread non-compliance.

Proposed Solution to Amend Act 119 and Remove the Size Threshold

My proposed solution is to amend Act 119 to close the loophole by eliminating the kennel size threshold. This change would ensure that all kennels, regardless of the number of dogs, must follow the same animal welfare standards.

Remove the exemption for kennels with fewer than 26 dogs. All breeding facilities should comply with the same health, safety, and welfare regulations, no matter their size.

Strengthen enforcement in rural areas. This includes ensuring compliance across the board, regardless of cultural beliefs. Animals raised for sale should be kept under humane and adequate conditions.

Mandate regular inspections. All kennels should undergo periodic inspections to ensure they meet updated welfare standards. Currently, some kennels go unchecked for years.Removing the size threshold will improve the overall quality of life for animals in breeding facilities. It will create a level playing field, making it harder for breeders to avoid the law. Promoting responsible breeding practices and discouraging unethical operators are critical steps, and amending Act 119 is essential to achieving this.

The Impact of These Reforms on Lancaster County

By closing this loophole, Lancaster County can set a strong example for animal welfare standards statewide, particularly within Amish and Mennonite communities.

Improved animal welfare. Healthier, happier dogs lead to better breeding outcomes and more satisfied customers.

Restored trust in local governance. Citizens of Lancaster County will see progress in addressing long-standing issues with animal treatment in these communities.

Enhanced reputation. This reform can position Lancaster County as a leader in ethical breeding practices, benefiting its residents and animals alike.Act 119 was a great start in improving animal welfare in Lancaster County. However, it’s clear that the law needs to evolve to address its shortcomings.

I urge you to reach out to your local representatives and advocate for these changes. Together, we can update Act 119 to close the loophole and ensure the well-being of all animals in Pennsylvania.

Let’s work together to make a difference.

Works Cited:
Pennsylvania General Assembly. “Act 119 of 2004.” Legislative Reference Bureau, Pennsylvania 
General Assembly, 2004, https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/li/uconsCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&yr=2004&sessInd=0&act=0119.&chpt=000.&subchpt=000.&sctn=003.&subsctn=000.

For more stories like this one check out: